CloverETL vs WhereScape RED comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Javlin Logo
284 views|239 comparisons
WhereScape Logo
2,831 views|1,872 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and WhereScape RED based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages.""Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use.""Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility.""No dependence on native language and ease of use.​​"

More CloverETL Pros →

"Their support staff are very knowledgeable, courteous, and professional. I feel their support staff go above and beyond to assure their customers are satisfied.""Naturally produces a way to easily debug your DW data solutions.""RED has provided us the ability to integrate, stage, and transform data from diverse sources into an enterprise-grade data warehouse which meets the needs of my organization, but it also enables us to easily and quickly make ETL or DW changes.""I found the initial setup very easy.""WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time.""RED generates comprehensive documentation and regenerates it as quickly as things changes, but it also provides impact documentation.""WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database.""Support is absolutely excellent, efficient, and timely."

More WhereScape RED Pros →

Cons
"Its documentation could be improved.​""Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server.""​Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough.​"

More CloverETL Cons →

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated).""Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment.""No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded .""They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box.""Technical support isn't the best.""The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it.""The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application.""Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved."

More WhereScape RED Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."
  • "ROI is at least 10 times."
  • "Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."
  • "Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."
  • More WhereScape RED Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    57th
    out of 94 in Data Integration
    Views
    284
    Comparisons
    239
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    44th
    out of 94 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,831
    Comparisons
    1,872
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    WhereScape
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

    WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

    Sample Customers
    IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
    British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Performing Arts11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company20%
    University20%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloverETL is ranked 57th in Data Integration while WhereScape RED is ranked 44th in Data Integration. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while WhereScape RED is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhereScape RED writes "Quick to set up, flexible, and stable". CloverETL is most compared with Talend Open Studio, iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas WhereScape RED is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Matillion ETL and Denodo.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.