We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare CMiC ERP vs. Infor M3

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CMiC ERP Logo
290 views|258 comparisons
Infor M3 Logo
2,436 views|2,171 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: October 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Infor M3 is a solid ERP, I worked with it prior to the Lawson/Infor merger. Very strong in process manufacturing with a good history in Food & Beverage, Life Sciences, and other verticals. S3 is used… more »
Top Answer:  provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management.
Top Answer: From a technology perspective, this is an old solution making it harder to integrate and maintain. Ideally, they should be offering a cloud-based alternative.
Ranking
31st
out of 54 in ERP
Views
290
Comparisons
258
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
2,436
Comparisons
2,171
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
281
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3
Learn More
Overview
CMiC has made resource planning easy by creating an interactive schedule with a dynamic timeline that visualizes the project resource plan for your entire organization. The schedule often replaces a static resource management spreadsheet for your teams. CMiC enables you to make resource management decisions on the fly while quickly viewing resource availability. Your project resourcing team is constantly balancing skills and availability. Our resource planning solution helps match individual resources to the project’s requirements by finding team members according to their skills and availability. CMiC Resource Planning pulls all the information for each project together into a simple, user-friendly interface.

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Offer
Learn more about CMiC ERP
Learn more about Infor M3
Sample Customers
Paric Coporation, xCloud, Webcor Builders, PC Construction, Beck, Govan Brown + Associates, Layton, Gerald H. Phipps
Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Construction Company19%
University5%
Healthcare Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider28%
Manufacturing Company5%
Government4%
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: October 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CMiC ERP is ranked 31st in ERP while Infor M3 is ranked 15th in ERP with 2 reviews. CMiC ERP is rated 0.0, while Infor M3 is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infor M3 writes "Helps to keep things in order, and they have good technical support that is responsive". CMiC ERP is most compared with Viewpoint ERP, SAP ERP and SAP S4HANA, whereas Infor M3 is most compared with Infor LN, SAP ERP, SAP S4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics NAV and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.