We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."
"CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"The product has valuable security features."
"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The functionality is of the solution is very good."
"SAP HANA's best features are its programmability and extensibility - you can size and shape the software however you need."
"The performance is very, very good. It's one of the best aspects of the solution."
"We have found the solution to be customizable and it is beneficial it comes as a bundled package. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"I like the integration process. Also, the data is trusted by our management, and we use the data from transactions for analysis."
"The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"Technical support should be more customer-friendly."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
"The installation process could be more straightforward."
"When we are using SAP HANA we have some difficulty with the customization. We would like to be able to add and make customized menus."
"I would like to see improvements in the connectivity of the solution with other BI software. Not every software can connect to it natively."
"High availability and disaster recovery are very poor in HANA."
"SAP HANA's long run time to extract data could be improved upon."
"They can improve their technology for the CRM subsystem. There are other products that are better and more effective for the CRM subsystem. Its price could be better. It is expensive."
CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 79 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and Teradata, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our CockroachDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.