Takeshi MatsudaExecutive Director / R&D Dept. General Manager at Riz Inc.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"It is a stable program."
"The functionality of the solution is excellent."
"It's a pre-configured appliance that requires very little in terms of setting-up."
"The performance is great, we are able to query our data in one operation."
"I like this solution's ease of design and the fact that its performance is quite good. It is stable as well."
"The flexibility in design is very good."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"An additional feature I would you like to see included in the next release, is that it needs to be more cloud-friendly."
"I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."
"It could use some more advanced analytics relating to structured and semi-structured data."
"I would like to see more integration with many different types of data."
"The scalability could be better. The on-premises solution is always more complicated to scale."
"Teradata should focus on functionality for building predictive models because, in that regard, it can definitely improve."
"The solution requires a license."
"The price of Teradata is on the higher side, and I think that it where they lose out on some of their business."
Earn 20 points
CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.
CockroachDB is inspired by Google’sand technologies, and it’s completely .
Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.
CockroachDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews while Teradata is ranked 5th in Relational Databases with 6 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 6.0, while Teradata is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Simple to deploy and the support is good, but better features for high availability are needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Good performance, flexible, easy to tune queries, and scales well". CockroachDB is most compared with Citus Data, SQL Server, MySQL and Oracle Database, whereas Teradata is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Snowflake, SQL Server, Amazon Redshift and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. See our CockroachDB vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.