CockroachDB vs Tibero comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cockroach Logo
4,160 views|2,803 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
TmaxSoft Logo
979 views|824 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and Tibero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations.""The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds.""The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good.""The product has valuable security features.""I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance.""CockroachDB is highly reliable.""The initial setup and deployment are simple.""The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

More CockroachDB Pros →

"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database.""Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast.""Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc.""Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."

More Tibero Pros →

Cons
"The platform could be more extensible.""I find the serverless offer a bit confusing.""CockroachDB needs to improve store processes.""The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling.""We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning.""The initial setup and pricing could be improved.""The product must improve its disaster recovery features.""Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

More CockroachDB Cons →

"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded.""In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."

More Tibero Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."
  • "The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."
  • "The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."
  • More CockroachDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."
  • "The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."
  • More Tibero Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.
    Top Answer:I find the serverless offer a bit confusing. The price is a function of the maximum database size. A single SELECT can use a number of request units, for example. If the throughput is high enough, you… more »
    Top Answer:Cockroach nodes were installed in the following: 1. Single host, triple nodes (containers): for evaluation on a low-end PC. 2. Single host, triple nodes (process): to test applications against a… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    4,160
    Comparisons
    2,803
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    979
    Comparisons
    824
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Citus Data logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Amazon Aurora logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 59% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Altibase logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

    CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

    Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

    Sample Customers
    Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias
    NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer5%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Tibero is ranked 25th in Relational Databases Tools. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while Tibero is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and SQL Server, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, SQL Server, MariaDB and Altibase.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.