Code Worldwide adZU vs Percolate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Code Worldwide Logo
87 views|44 comparisons
Percolate Logo
71 views|25 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
87
Comparisons
44
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
71
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
adZU
Learn More
Overview

adZU is organised into a series of studios, each of which contains a number of different apps to help you automate, implement and deliver your marketing.

Percolate is a leading CMP purpose-built to alleviate some of the most pressing challenges facing global marketing organizations today.
Sample Customers
Mercedes-Benz, Vauxhall, AutoTrader, Peugeot, Acura, SAAB, Nissan, Chevrolet, Citroen
GE, Chobani, MasterCard, Amtrak, Freshpet, Unilever, Boost Mobile, Visa, Western Digital, U.S. Cellular, CA Techniologies, Aloha, Hibbett Sports
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization65%
Financial Services Firm7%
Computer Software Company7%
Legal Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise67%
Large Enterprise18%

Code Worldwide adZU is ranked 6th in Marketing Resource Management while Percolate is ranked 8th in Marketing Resource Management. Code Worldwide adZU is rated 0.0, while Percolate is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Percolate writes "​Instead of operating in silos and not knowing what other teammates are working on, we are able to collaborate and maximize our initiatives". Code Worldwide adZU is most compared with , whereas Percolate is most compared with .

See our list of best Marketing Resource Management vendors.

We monitor all Marketing Resource Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.