Code42 Incydr vs Quest NetVault comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Code42 Logo
489 views|374 comparisons
Quest Software Logo
1,925 views|1,206 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Code42 Incydr and Quest NetVault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Code42 Incydr vs. Quest NetVault Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan.""Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer.""It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive.""Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.""It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets.""Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use""The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable.""Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

More Code42 Incydr Pros →

"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great.""The interface is very user-friendly.""If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails.""The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes.""The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want.""It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us.""The user interface is good.""The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

More Quest NetVault Pros →

Cons
"​Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products.""You can't always filter out data that you'd like to.""In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue.""The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions.""Java, please get rid of Java.""I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin.""More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD).""There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."

More Code42 Incydr Cons →

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement.""There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency.""The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find.""I would like to see the option of cloud-based management.""There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily.""In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault.""The stability of the solution is poor.""The initial setup is a little complex."

More Quest NetVault Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
  • "It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
  • "It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
  • "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
  • More Code42 Incydr Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."
  • "When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."
  • "The tool is expensive."
  • More Quest NetVault Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
    Top Answer:In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process… more »
    Top Answer:When I first became acquainted with Code42, we were implementing it at an employer I worked with, and that was a successful implementation. I now work for a consulting firm, and we do system… more »
    Top Answer:NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution It is easy to use right out of the box and scales… more »
    Top Answer:If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails.
    Top Answer:The storage capacity is very low. The solution removes all the data in 15 days. We need the history for at least one or two months. I need the history whenever I run Tape. I need the details of the… more »
    Ranking
    30th
    out of 131 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    489
    Comparisons
    374
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,697
    Rating
    8.5
    44th
    out of 131 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    1,925
    Comparisons
    1,206
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone
    Learn More
    Overview

    Detect file exfiltration via web browsers, USB, cloud apps, email, file link sharing, Airdrop, and more. See how files are moved and shared across your entire organization – without the need for policies, proxies or plugins. Incydr automatically identifies when files move outside your trusted environment, allowing you to easily detect when files are sent to personal accounts and unmanaged devices.

    Incydr prioritizes file activity based on 120+ contextual Incydr Risk Indicators (IRIs). This prioritization works on day 1 without any configuration. Incydr’s risk scoring logic is use case-driven and transparent to administrators. Incydr uses Watchlists to programmatically protect data from employees who are most likely to leak or steal files, such as departing employees.

    Take action with appropriate responses to contain, resolve and educate on detected risk. Use Incydr Flows or SOAR integrations to initiate response controls that are proportionate to an activity’s risk severity. You’ll stop data leaks without getting in the way of employee collaboration and sanctioned file activity.

    Improving your Insider Risk posture requires a change in employee behavior. Code42 Instructor provides bite-sized training to employees, delivered when they need it. Use Instructor in tandem with Incydr to send responsive video lessons when employees put data at risk. You’ll ensure appropriate data governance and compliance with security standards and corporate policies as well as report on the positive impact of your Insider Risk Management program.

    Founded in 2001, the company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and backed by Accel Partners, JMI Equity, NEA, and Split Rock Partners. For more information, visit code42.com.

    Cloud-ready data recovery software for the hybrid data center. Protect your applications and data on-premises and in the cloud — from one intuitive console — with this scalable data backup and recovery software. NetVault® by Quest supports multiple server and application platforms in both physical and virtual environments. That means you can ensure continuous availability of your business-critical systems, applications and data.

    Sample Customers
    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University18%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Media Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    University6%
    Educational Organization6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Code42 Incydr vs. Quest NetVault
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Code42 Incydr vs. Quest NetVault and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Code42 Incydr is ranked 30th in Backup and Recovery with 78 reviews while Quest NetVault is ranked 44th in Backup and Recovery with 10 reviews. Code42 Incydr is rated 9.0, while Quest NetVault is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest NetVault writes "Easy to use, stable, affordable pricing model, and good technical support". Code42 Incydr is most compared with Threat Detection, Investigation & Response (TDIR) Platform, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Morphisec and Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365, whereas Quest NetVault is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Quest Rapid Recovery, Veritas NetBackup, Commvault Cloud and Azure Backup. See our Code42 Incydr vs. Quest NetVault report.

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.