Compare IBM Rational ALM vs. codeBeamer ALM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
codeBeamer ALM Logo
1,894 views|1,385 comparisons
IBM Rational ALM Logo
1,802 views|1,348 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ALM vs. codeBeamer ALM and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China."

More codeBeamer ALM Pros »

"The cataloging is a very valuable feature. For a lot of enterprises, they end up not knowing which applications do specific features. The cataloging helps with this. It's not that verbose, but it still gives you allowances to put in more detail.""It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete.""It helped us contain critical things, like source code and several documents, which is very important to us.""At the same time, if you're working from the architect or the designing team you, it's quite easy to manage the resources online.""The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.""You can customize the board according to your needs."

More IBM Rational ALM Pros »

Cons
"We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets.""Usability needs to be improved.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup."

More codeBeamer ALM Cons »

"The features should be more intuitive. If I'm looking for something, its location should be easy to locate.""There is not enough beginner support material in the form of FAQs or simple training to help you get started.""Of course it would be related to customer experience. The solution is not user friendly at all. It needs an expert to use it, although the reporting feature was okay.""The directory designer manager is uncivil. The design manager is clearly really unstable.""The stability of this solution can be improved.""The reporting functionality needs to be improved."

More IBM Rational ALM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions.""It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

More codeBeamer ALM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.
Top Answer: Usability needs to be improved.
Top Answer: I use this solution for requirement management, task tracking, bug tracking, and change tracking.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.
Top Answer: The stability of this solution can be improved.
Top Answer: We are a central, systems integration team that provides different solutions to vendors and business partners. We have a lab available on-premises and we work with all of the latest tools available in… more »
Ranking
Views
1,894
Comparisons
1,385
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
375
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
1,802
Comparisons
1,348
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
554
Avg. Rating
7.2
Popular Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational ALM, MKS
Learn
Intland Software
IBM
Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

Lifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.
Offer
Learn more about codeBeamer ALM
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Sample Customers
Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, DassaultTennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company17%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Manufacturing Company13%
Comms Service Provider9%
Retailer6%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ALM vs. codeBeamer ALM and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
codeBeamer ALM is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while IBM Rational ALM is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 6 reviews. codeBeamer ALM is rated 7.0, while IBM Rational ALM is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of codeBeamer ALM writes "Good metrics and lifecycle connectivity, but better setup documentation and reporting is needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Helped with time management, improved our resource utility, and helped assure on-time completion". codeBeamer ALM is most compared with Jira, Polarion ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jama Connect and TFS, whereas IBM Rational ALM is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, PTC Integrity, TFS and Polarion ALM. See our IBM Rational ALM vs. codeBeamer ALM report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.