Compare JIRA vs. codeBeamer ALM

codeBeamer ALM is ranked 16th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while JIRA is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 31 reviews. codeBeamer ALM is rated 8.0, while JIRA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of codeBeamer ALM writes "A complete solution that assists with compliance in highly regulated industries". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA writes "Helps us work in Agile and Scrum formats across multiple locations and time zones". codeBeamer ALM is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and Jama Connect, whereas JIRA is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS and Micro Focus ALM Octane.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
codeBeamer ALM Logo
1,818 views|1,370 comparisons
JIRA Logo
Read 31 JIRA reviews.
68,415 views|59,304 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.

Read more »

The most valuable features in Jira are the dashboard, reports, and boards that help us to control the advancement of the project.Issue linking has enabled teams to trace issues.Transparency of development projects, as well as approval processes for some business projects, has improved massively.The most valuable feature of this solution is the source linking on the commit level to git.This solution assists us with being able to quickly and easily start sprints and keep accurate track of them, including billing using a time-tracking add-on.The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding.The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications.The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation.

Read more »

Cons
Usability needs to be improved.We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets.

Read more »

We would like to see the integration of a lite-version of Confluence, just to manage some of the templates and documents.The only thing that JIRA doesn't for us is release management in a way that I can create a list of versions easily.My main concern is the administration of projects, especially user groups, and this requires root access rights but there is no concept of layered admin rights.Backlog pruning and visualization are poor.The permissions can be challenging to get right.The reporting needs to be improved.This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number.The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions.

Read more »

To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money.Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use.We feel that the product is a good value for the cost.I understand JIRA is quite expensive.It does not cost that much.Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,818
Comparisons
1,370
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
318
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
68,415
Comparisons
59,304
Reviews
32
Average Words per Review
294
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
JIRA Software
Learn
Intland Software
Atlassian
Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

Offer
Learn more about codeBeamer ALM
Learn more about JIRA
Sample Customers
Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, DassaultSquare, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Manufacturing Company15%
Insurance Company13%
Software R&D Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.