Codebeamer vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Logo
3,948 views|3,057 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Parasoft Logo
200 views|154 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.""The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China.""The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability.""One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.""It is a stable solution."

More Codebeamer Pros →

"The most valuable feature is code coverage.""It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Pros →

Cons
"We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets.""It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now.""Usability needs to be improved.""The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved.""The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Certain areas in Codebeamer could be improved, like addressing small issues, glitches, or bugs."

More Codebeamer Cons →

"The solution's speed has room for improvement.""Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • More Codebeamer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
    Top Answer:As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
    Top Answer:During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
    Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,948
    Comparisons
    3,057
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    200
    Comparisons
    154
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    217
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    codeBeamer ALM
    Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
    Learn More
    Overview

    codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

    Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

    - Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

    - Preconfigured compliance reporting

    - Customized Advanced Analytics

    - Interactive Navigation of Results

    - Traceability

    Sample Customers
    Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
    General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Codebeamer is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews. Codebeamer is rated 7.8, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Codebeamer writes "Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Codebeamer is most compared with PTC Integrity, Polarion ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and Rally Software, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.