Codebeamer vs Serena ALM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Logo
3,948 views|3,057 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and Serena ALM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Serena ALM [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • More Codebeamer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
    Top Answer:Honestly, I don't think too much about what the product needs to improve. The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's UI is not friendly. I just think that… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,948
    Comparisons
    3,057
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    codeBeamer ALM
    Learn More
    Overview

    codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
    Generali France, Allianz
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Codebeamer is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while Serena ALM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Codebeamer is rated 7.8, while Serena ALM [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Codebeamer writes "Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement". On the other hand, Codebeamer is most compared with PTC Integrity, Polarion ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and IBM Rational ALM, whereas Serena ALM [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.