Synopsys Defensics vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Synopsys Logo
197 views|121 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trustwave Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is related to US usage with TLS contact fees, i.e. how more data center connections will help lower networking costs.""Whatever the test suit they give, it is intelligent. It will understand the protocol and it will generate the test cases based on the protocol: protocol, message sequence, protocol, message structure... Because of that, we can eliminate a lot of unwanted test cases, so we can execute the tests and complete them very quickly.""We have found multiple issues in our embedded system network protocols, related to buffer overflow. We have reduced some of these issues."

More Synopsys Defensics Pros →

"The stability is great. We haven't had any issues at all with it."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"It does not support the complete protocol stack. There are some IoT protocols that are not supported and new protocols that are not supported.""Sometimes, when we are testing embedded devices, when we trigger the test cases, the target will crash immediately. It is very difficult for us to identify the root cause of the crash because they do not provide sophisticated tools on the target side. They cover only the client-side application... They do not have diagnostic tools for the target side. Rather, they have them but they are very minimal and not very helpful.""Codenomicon Defensics should be more advanced for the testing sector. It should be somewhat easy and flexible to install."

More Synopsys Defensics Cons →

"I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
5th
out of 5 in Fuzz Testing Tools
Views
197
Comparisons
121
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Fuzz Testing Tools
Comparisons
Also Known As
Defensics, Codenomicon Defensics
Hailstorm, Cenzic Hailstorm
Learn More
Overview

DefensicsĀ® fuzz testing is a comprehensive, powerful, and automated black box solution that enables organizations to effectively and efficiently discover and remediate security weaknesses in software. By taking a systematic and intelligent approach to negative testing, Defensics allows organizations to ensure software security without compromising on product innovation, increasing time to market, or inflating operational costs.

Provides ability to test applications for security vulnerabilities, security policies and regulatory compliance.
Sample Customers
Coriant, CERT-FI, Next Generation Networks
Leading Health Insurer
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Financial Services Firm7%
University6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise73%
No Data Available

Synopsys Defensics is ranked 5th in Fuzz Testing Tools while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fuzz Testing Tools. Synopsys Defensics is rated 8.6, while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Synopsys Defensics writes "Technical support provided protocol-specific documentation to prove that some positives were not false". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] writes "It helps us troubleshoot failed scans and incomplete statuses". Synopsys Defensics is most compared with SonarQube, Snyk, Fortify on Demand, Invicti and HCL AppScan, whereas Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Fuzz Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.