Codeship vs Harness comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Codeship Logo
139 views|105 comparisons
Harness Logo
2,365 views|1,885 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codeship and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Codeship?
Misbah Mohammed Kollathodi
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
29th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
139
Comparisons
105
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
2,365
Comparisons
1,885
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Tekton logo
Compared 23% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Compared 21% of the time.
Bamboo logo
Compared 15% of the time.
TeamCity logo
Compared 10% of the time.
GitHub Actions logo
Compared 9% of the time.
Learn More
Harness
Video Not Available
Overview
Codeship is a fully customizable Continuous Integration Platform with native Docker support. Codeship gives you complete control over customizing and optimizing you CI and CD workflow. Choose which steps should run sequentially or in parallel, how many concurrent builds you want to run simultaneously among your account and get full control over which dependency version you want to run for each step or when to delete your dependencies and the cache. Codeship can provide complete developer autonomy. If you can run it in a Docker container, Codeship can run it for you.

Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

Sample Customers
Product Hunt, Bannerman, LendingCrowd, GameHouse Promotion Network, Mixcloud, qunb, Usetrace, Frontback
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Computer Software Company12%
Manufacturing Company7%
Healthcare Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise78%
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Codeship is ranked 29th in Build Automation while Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review. Codeship is rated 0.0, while Harness is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". Codeship is most compared with , whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.