Compare CodeSonar vs. Kiuwan

CodeSonar is ranked 16th in Application Security with 1 review while Kiuwan is ranked 14th in Application Security with 3 reviews. CodeSonar is rated 9.0, while Kiuwan is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CodeSonar writes "Catches critical code defects at the source code level". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Helps us find security vulnerabilities in our code before our customers do". CodeSonar is most compared with SonarQube and Coverity, whereas Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode and Checkmarx.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
47,953 views|25,711 comparisons
CodeSonar Logo
195 views|111 comparisons
Kiuwan Logo
6,429 views|3,936 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use CodeSonar? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important.It has an easy-to-use interface.Veracode provides faster scans compared to other static analysis security testing tools.It has almost completely eliminated the presence of SQLi vulnerabilities.

Read more »

The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating.We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them.I've found the reporting features the most helpful.

Read more »

Cons
One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.We would like a way to mark entire modules as "safe." The lack of this feature hasn't stopped us previously, it just makes our task more tedious at times. That kind of feature would save us time.Veracode scans provide a higher number of false positives.The overall reporting structure is complicated, and it's difficult to understand the report.It needs more timely support for newer languages and framework versions.

Read more »

The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved.

Read more »

I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution.I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs.The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.

Read more »

Pricing is a bit costly.

Read more »

This solution is cheaper than other tools.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 82% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 56% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
Veracode
GrammaTech
Kiuwan
Overview

Veracode is an application security company that offers an automated cloud-based service for securing web, mobile and third-party enterprise applications. Veracode provides multiple security analysis technologies on a single platform, including static analysis, dynamic analysis, mobile application behavioral analysis and software composition analysis.

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Offer
Learn More About Veracode

Stay Up-To-Date on Application Security 

Learn more about CodeSonar
Learn more about Kiuwan
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerViveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONYDHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Insurance Company17%
Consumer Goods9%
Pharma/Biotech Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm9%
Retailer5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company30%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Retailer11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email