CodeSonar vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CodeSecure Logo
1,934 views|1,241 comparisons
Spirent Logo
193 views|121 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CodeSonar and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful.""The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks.""CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.""There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing.""It has been able to scale.""The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful.""What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

More CodeSonar Pros →

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator.""CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function.""CyberFlood is flexible."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security.""In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred.""The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved.""There could be a shared licensing model for the users.""In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category.""CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C.""It was expensive."

More CodeSonar Cons →

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.""The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes.""Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is a bit costly."
  • "The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."
  • "Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."
  • "The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."
  • More CodeSonar Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.
    Top Answer:The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
    Top Answer:Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It will… more »
    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,934
    Comparisons
    1,241
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    193
    Comparisons
    121
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview

    GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    University9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CodeSonar is ranked 22nd in Application Security Tools with 7 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. CodeSonar is rated 8.2, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CodeSonar writes "Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". CodeSonar is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork, Polyspace Code Prover and Fortify Static Code Analyzer, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our CodeSonar vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.