• Home
  • CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] vs. OpenText Deployment Automation

CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] vs OpenText Deployment Automation comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    23rd
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    116
    Comparisons
    58
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Elastic Server
    Micro Focus Deployment Automation, Serena Deployment Automation
    Learn More
    Cohesive Networks
    OpenText
    Overview

    Elastic Server simplifies the process of creating application stacks for use on EC2 and other virtual environments. Instead of the painstaking manual downloading, configuration, building, and installation that is otherwise required when creating a complex stack, Elastic Server provides a menu-driven selection and build process.

    Deployment Automation enables repeatable, reliable and audit-compliant processes to simplify application deployments, reduce risk and increase the velocity of delivery across all environments of your delivery pipeline. It seamlessly enables deployment pipeline automation, reducing cycle times and providing rapid feedback on build deployments and releases into production. Reusable deployment templates allow reuse of processes and properties, simplifying the setup of new deployment processes. Supporting continuous integration and continuous deployments, Deployment Automation bridges the DevOps divide by simplifying and automating handoffs and deployments across development and operations teams. More information here.

    Sample Customers
    Geezeo, PayNearMe, AngelEye Camera Systems, CodeObjects, Imagination, MTech Communications, Quantum Retail, Trek10, Foley Carrier Services
    GuideStone, TIAA CREF, EatonVance, Gordmans, D&B, Walkers,, Citi, Department of Health and Human Services USA, UBS, DTCC, Bp, Aflc, Ameritrade, Credit Agricole, Telecom Italia, GreatAmerican, Safeway, Allianz, Groupama, Generali Group.

    CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while OpenText Deployment Automation is ranked 23rd in Release Automation. CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Deployment Automation is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Deployment Automation is most compared with .

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.