Compare Collibra Catalog vs. SAP PowerDesigner

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Collibra Catalog Logo
2,809 views|2,596 comparisons
SAP PowerDesigner Logo
5,711 views|3,560 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra Catalog vs. SAP PowerDesigner and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I bought the software outright and do not pay a licensing fee.""SAP PowerDesigner is cheaper than eriwin.""The price of the solution is too expensive. When we asked for certain licenses in different countries it was unattainable."

More SAP PowerDesigner Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I like the connectivity or the lineage between the models and usability.
Top Answer: Technical support could be better and more human.
Ranking
7th
out of 23 in Metadata Management
Views
2,809
Comparisons
2,596
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
out of 23 in Metadata Management
Views
5,711
Comparisons
3,560
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
669
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sybase PowerDesigner
Learn More
SAP
Video Not Available
Overview

Collibra Catalog is both a report and a data catalog that helps analysts and information users spend less time looking for essential clinical, financial, and operational data and more time solving critical business challenges.

Plan and manage complex business transformation initiatives with SAP PowerDesigner. The software’s data modeling tools let you build a blueprint of your current enterprise architecture and visualize the impact of change before it happens. Automatically capture architecture layers and requirements, tap into a powerful metadata repository, and share discoveries with your team.

Offer
Learn more about Collibra Catalog
Learn more about SAP PowerDesigner
Sample Customers
AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive
Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise42%
Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra Catalog vs. SAP PowerDesigner and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Collibra Catalog is ranked 7th in Metadata Management while SAP PowerDesigner is ranked 1st in Metadata Management with 11 reviews. Collibra Catalog is rated 0.0, while SAP PowerDesigner is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP PowerDesigner writes "Ability to work on a single repository is great; web portal enables view from the browser perspective". Collibra Catalog is most compared with Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, Azure Data Factory, Denodo, Palantir Foundry and IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, whereas SAP PowerDesigner is most compared with erwin Data Modeler (DM), erwin Evolve, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer and Bizagi.

See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.