Compare Comarch EDI vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.""The pricing for this solution is fine.""There are fees in addition to the licensing.""It's not an expensive solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution.
Top Answer: We centralize all interfaces that we need to have. However, we spend too much money and time to construct each interface. This is required due to the fact that the systems are outdated. We need to be… more »
Ranking
Views
84
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
7,292
Comparisons
5,418
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
723
Rating
7.9
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
Learn More
Overview

Comarch EDI provides your company with a competitive advantage by fast and secure transmission of data from all business partners in the world. We guarantee the automation of data processing across the supply chain starting with the ordering process, through the picking and delivery, all the way to invoicing and processing of payments.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
Offer
Learn more about Comarch EDI
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Sample Customers
METRO-NOM, Carrefour Poland
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company22%
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
Mining And Metals Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comarch EDI is ranked 22nd in Business-to-Business Middleware while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 10 reviews. Comarch EDI is rated 0.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Gateway for all integrations that is stable and quick to install". Comarch EDI is most compared with , whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, SAP Data Services, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and TIBCO Cloud Integration.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.