• Home
  • Comarch EDI vs. SWIFTnet FIN

Comarch EDI vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comarch Logo

Comarch EDI

81 views|59 comparisons
SWIFT Logo

SWIFTnet FIN

Read 1 SWIFTnet FIN review
1,036 views|844 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comarch EDI and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Comarch EDI?
OleksiiShcherbatiuk
Has strong stability and professional support
Ranking
21st
out of 27 in Business-to-Business Middleware
Views
81
Comparisons
59
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 27 in Business-to-Business Middleware
Views
1,036
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Comarch
SWIFT
Overview

Comarch EDI provides your company with a competitive advantage by fast and secure transmission of data from all business partners in the world. We guarantee the automation of data processing across the supply chain starting with the ordering process, through the picking and delivery, all the way to invoicing and processing of payments.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Sample Customers
METRO-NOM, Carrefour Poland
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm58%
Computer Software Company9%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise82%
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comarch EDI is ranked 21st in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. Comarch EDI is rated 0.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". Comarch EDI is most compared with , whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.