Comindware Team Network [EOL] vs MangoApps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MangoApps Logo
20 views|15 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comindware Team Network [EOL] and MangoApps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Enterprise Social Software
11th
out of 15 in Enterprise Intranet
Views
20
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
MangoApps
Video Not Available
Overview
The Social Collaboration software supports private and public discussions allowing for knowledge sharing among co-workers and external system users. Thanks to the fully configurable Digital Workspace, Comindware Social Collaboration tool ensures full traceability and accessibility of the business context.

Comindware Team Collaboration tool supports communication within and across Processes, Projects, Cases and Tasks and unifies people and knowledge in a single work environment.

  • Regardless of the origin of the conversation – be that within a project, process or case – in enterprise social network it can be traced to the related activities and task performers
  • Comindware Discussions allow getting rid of unstructured group e-mails and unrelated conversations common for instant messengers
  • Documents are managed centrally with advanced capabilities for archiving, versioning and notifications
  • Comindware Rooms serve to engage colleagues as well as partners and customers to effectively collaborate as a single team


MangoApps All-In-One allows clients to consolidate, eliminate cost & complexity of multiple tools and enables them to focus on delivering many use cases and application scenarios. It helps clients deliver a more purposeful workplace to employees, customers, and partners by positioning MangoApps as the workgrid to all existing enterprise applications.

Sample Customers
Gazpromavia, Open Vision
Redpath and Company, See's Candies, United Way of Greater St. Louis, Lubrizol Corp., UC Hastings College of the Law, EBSGateway, Coughlin Porter Lundeen, Giffels Webster, VaperMate, Western Entertainment Management, Enaya Insurance, North York Community House, TC Media, European Electronique, Modern Technology Solutions Inc., American Chemical Society Publications, Marcaria.com, ReachGlobal, agile360, Palmer Holland, Wunderman, EPMG, Shorelight Education
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comindware Team Network [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Social Software while MangoApps is ranked 11th in Enterprise Intranet. Comindware Team Network [EOL] is rated 0.0, while MangoApps is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of MangoApps writes "My recommendation for communication, filesharing, knowledge base management, and project management". Comindware Team Network [EOL] is most compared with , whereas MangoApps is most compared with .

We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.