We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
Comindware Tracker is ranked 32nd in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 33rd in Process Automation. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
