We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Comindware Tracker vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
