We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OpenText Operations Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"Low code development."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."
"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."
"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."
"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."
"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."
More OpenText Operations Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 32nd in Process Automation while OpenText Operations Orchestration is ranked 17th in Process Automation with 24 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OpenText Operations Orchestration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Orchestration writes "HP OO blows away the competition, but has its fair share of flaws". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OpenText Operations Orchestration is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Control-M, Camunda, BigFix and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
