We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"The tool makes the development process easier."
"Our previous solution had other overheads such as release management, version management, code management, monitoring, etc., all of which are built-in with OutSystems."
"I find it to be a genuinely cool and effective platform for my development needs."
"The product is mostly stable."
"We can do the validation before calling the API."
"We've used features like batch processing timers, components, and integrations with other systems like SAP, which have accelerated our development process.In terms of productivity, we've seen a 30 percent reduction in screen design time and an additional 10 percent improvement when implementing client requirements. OutSystems' integration capabilities have significantly enhanced our app's functionality, making it quicker and easier to connect with other systems."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of OutSystems is easy."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"I think OutSystems needs to improve in many areas. First, sometimes Service Studio becomes really slow and even hangs for long periods. Also, if I have not published my module in some time, and some kind of Service Studio exception occurs, I lose my work."
"The largest obstacle currently associated with OutSystems is its high cost and limited availability of skilled personnel. Despite being a rapid application development platform, having a highly skilled individual familiar with the platform can be much more beneficial than an inexperienced individual. Because there is a shortage of people with the necessary OutSystems skills, utilizing the platform can become expensive. This makes little sense, considering that a rapid application development platform should be accessible to the average person. However, having a highly skilled individual can greatly increase productivity, making the cost worthwhile."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"I like the OutSystems platform. I am working on integrating it with another platform using APIs, however, it has proven to be difficult. The main issue I am facing is obtaining authorization tokens as well as access and refresh tokens. It may be due to my lack of knowledge of APIs as it is new to me."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"While I can't speak to the market impact, as a developer, I've seen significant reductions in development time across different versions of our applications. One area for improvement would be the UI controls in Service Studio. Sometimes, controls don't appear in the IDE, requiring us to check them in the web browser instead. Overall, our experience with OutSystems has been positive, though improvements in UI development would be welcomed."
"The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX).
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
