• Home
  • CommonTime mDesign vs. Microsoft Exchange

CommonTime mDesign vs Microsoft Exchange comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CommonTime Logo

CommonTime mDesign

20 views|3 comparisons
Microsoft Logo

Microsoft Exchange

Read 78 Microsoft Exchange reviews
466 views|408 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Use CommonTime mDesign?
Anonymous User
Offers stability and easy integration with other Microsoft products, but needs to use less resources and be more...
Because of this solution we have better integration with other Microsoft Office solutions.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "They are flexible when it comes to pricing, unlike most of the other vendors I have dealt with."
  • "It's working very well. There is no problem, but the price is not the best."
  • "Its price is okay."
  • "It's a little bit expensive."
  • "Its price is very affordable, and basically, it is the standard of the industry. We have the Exchange 365 subscription, which includes the usage of Exchange Online. I don't know the specific cost, but it is the retail price of Microsoft 365 E3 licenses. Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. Microsoft changes rules every other day, which makes it difficult for us to understand the licensing not only for Exchange but also for other products. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing."
  • "Microsoft doesn't have a unit price, it's based on the quantity, and they offer great discounts."
  • "We are currently using enterprise licenses for the solution. They are different pricing models available. There are individual, cloud-based, and enterprise licenses all with different pricing models. The larger the number of users, the lesser the price. For small to medium companies like us, we feel it is expensive."
  • "Its price is fair."

    • More Microsoft Exchange Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless Email solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?
    Top Answer:Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I… more »
    What do you like most about Microsoft Exchange?
    Top Answer:The initial setup was straightforward and fast.
    Read all 47 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Exchange?
    Top Answer:Compared to the other options in the market, the licensing costs attached to Microsoft Exchange seem reasonable.
    Read all 30 answers   →
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 7 in Wireless Email
    Views
    20
    Comparisons
    3
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    out of 7 in Wireless Email
    Views
    466
    Comparisons
    408
    Reviews
    35
    Average Words per Review
    368
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Exchange, MS Exchange
    Learn More
    CommonTime
    Microsoft
    Overview
    CommonTime mDesign now allows for hosting in the cloud, using a service such as Amazon Web Services. This can be managed directly by CommonTime and provides a quicker and more cost-effective method of implementing the mDesign platform and deployment of mDesign apps. With this latest SaaS functionality, organisations can dramatically reduce the capital costs of deploying apps, as the infrastructure requirements are almost totally negated. Upfront service costs are usually also reduced due to the comparative ease of installation and management. mDesign 6.1 provides some significant mobile application management (MAM) features which allows users and administrators to manage their application estates more effectively. These include:- Improvements in Push Notifications - GPS, Logging, Settings, Wipe and Custom - Implemented on all clients and Command line utilities on server.
    Built to deliver the enterprise-grade security and reliability that businesses require, Microsoft Exchange provides email, calendar and contacts on your PC, phone and web browser.
    Sample Customers
    Carillion PLC, Moat Homes
    Paderborn-Lippstadt Airport, Scitec Nutrition, British Airways, InnoGames, Osteology Foundation, Franz Haniel & Cie. GmbH, NTC Contracting
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise50%

    CommonTime mDesign is ranked 7th in Wireless Email while Microsoft Exchange is ranked 1st in Wireless Email with 78 reviews. CommonTime mDesign is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Exchange is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange writes "Very stable with an easy-to-use email management system". CommonTime mDesign is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Exchange is most compared with Zimbra Collaboration, KerioConnect, HCL Domino, Open-Xchange and HCL Notes.

    See our list of best Wireless Email vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless Email reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.