• Home
  • CommonTime mDesign vs. Sybase iAnywhere [EOL]

CommonTime mDesign vs Sybase iAnywhere [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
7th
out of 7 in Wireless Email
Views
20
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Wireless Email
Comparisons
Learn More
CommonTime
SAP
Video Not Available
Overview
CommonTime mDesign now allows for hosting in the cloud, using a service such as Amazon Web Services. This can be managed directly by CommonTime and provides a quicker and more cost-effective method of implementing the mDesign platform and deployment of mDesign apps. With this latest SaaS functionality, organisations can dramatically reduce the capital costs of deploying apps, as the infrastructure requirements are almost totally negated. Upfront service costs are usually also reduced due to the comparative ease of installation and management. mDesign 6.1 provides some significant mobile application management (MAM) features which allows users and administrators to manage their application estates more effectively. These include:- Improvements in Push Notifications - GPS, Logging, Settings, Wipe and Custom - Implemented on all clients and Command line utilities on server.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Carillion PLC, Moat Homes
Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

CommonTime mDesign is ranked 7th in Wireless Email while Sybase iAnywhere [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Wireless Email. CommonTime mDesign is rated 0.0, while Sybase iAnywhere [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CommonTime mDesign is most compared with , whereas Sybase iAnywhere [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Wireless Email vendors.

We monitor all Wireless Email reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.