We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and OpenText EnCase eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery."It has significantly reduced the amount of manual work required to manage our backup operations. We're going from an on-prem to a non-on-prem, we're all doing nonsolutions. So we really can't compare it against anything else."
"Technical support is great."
"Commvault Backup & Recovery's search utility is its most valuable feature."
"We can go from one page to another page, from office backups to VM backups, or applications like secret backups. So everything can be configured or restored from a single pin."
"The product is a reliable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to backup over the dedicated Fiber Channel directly from SAN."
"It integrates redundant storage and preserves jams in a storage area, providing up to 70% compression rate."
"The solution has the fastest backup and better licensing."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"They can improve the security level for Windows. When mapping to the Windows, Commvault can take full control over data volumes so that the attacker can't delete the volume data, but the Windows admin can access the volumes. It would be great to block access at that level."
"The new HTML5-based management portals are very nice, but do not yet have all of the features of the Java-based client."
"Mostly controls, visibility, cost allocation."
"One issue we face is the complexity of the console. That could be improved on. It takes users time to get familiar with Commvault. On average, it takes our customers between one and three months to learn it. The console and the way you configure Commvault have very advanced settings. It takes time to understand how it works."
"It does not have an easy deployment. The deployment is not something that just anybody can go in and deploy."
"My customers are not satisfied with the tool because there is a little trouble with the throughput of Metallic."
"The HTML interface is a remarkable improvement. However, there are still some features that are not available in that interface that are available in the Java console, but I'm sure that will come with time."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly GUI."
"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 2nd in eDiscovery with 104 reviews while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 4th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and Cohesity DataProtect, whereas OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.