Commvault vs. Veritas Backup Exec
Commvault is ranked 10th in Backup and Recovery Software with 9 reviews vs Veritas Backup Exec which is ranked 12th in Backup and Recovery Software with 8 reviews. The top reviewer of Commvault writes "One of the biggest features is the global deduplication of our data sets". The top reviewer of Veritas Backup Exec writes "Two main purposes that we are using this application is for backup and restore". Commvault is most compared with Veritas NetBackup, Veeam Backup & Replication and Rubrik. Veritas Backup Exec is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup and Acronis Backup. See our Commvault vs. Veritas Backup Exec report.
+Add products to compare
Based on 8 reviews. |
Most Helpful Review | ||||||
|
| Use Null Product? Share your opinion. | ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault vs. Veritas Backup Exec and others in Backup and Recovery Software. 300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||||
Quotes From Members Comparing Commvault vs. Veritas Backup Exec
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:Pros | ||
It's an enterprise product. It's a stable product. We have good support. Almost all databases are in the scope. Backup and archive with a single window, with a single backup job. You only need to type "c". Cloud integration. Great archive feature, OnePass, for the file system and Exchange servers. A very stable and scalable platform (you can backup/restore/protect a couple of MBs or hundred of TBs as well from the same console/platform). One-Pass (Archive) DataBase backup (Online Backup and Granular level restore), VM backup and restore. Well documented SQL views and customizable reports, together with scripts and workflows provides ability to automate processes and ensure proper controls are in place. The cloud integration is a massive win for us, giving us a single backup service for all of our on-premise and cloud systems. | The backup solution comes in different versions to support different platforms. It is one of the most stable backup solutions. Backup Exec 2012 R2 is a very good product for the Windows file system and SQL backups. It is very user-friendly, but the next version Backup Exec 2014 that is released and the other next versions of Backup Exec product is not so friendly. One of the valuable features is the instant recovery for VMs. It reduces the RTO (Recovery Time Objective) drastically. The interface easy to use and it is compatible with most backup devices. It gives us the ability to locate and restore critical files which users may have intentionally or unknowing deleted a while ago. For us, the main two features that we appreciate in this application are backup and restore. They are the main purposes for which we are using this application. | |
Cons | ||
You need quite a lot of human resources to maintain a Commvault environment, to keep it operational. Also, it would be nice to if there were an easier way set up some Commvault components. The HTML interface is a remarkable improvement. However, there are still some features that are not available in that interface that are available in the Java console, but I'm sure that will come with time. I just wanted to compare the features, which are there in EMC NetWorker, which are not available in Commvault. We have things using Networker. Training. Reduce the complexity for better understanding of the reports. There are a lot of variables in which you can get confused while elaborating on reports. Endpoint backup. Mostly controls, visibility, cost allocation. The new HTML5-based management portals are very nice, but do not yet have all of the features of the Java-based client. | Enhanced support for cloud backup needs to be added. Initial setup is a bit complex and needs some expertise for troubleshooting when something goes wrong. It is not a recommended software when it comes to large environments where there has to be a minimal Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and/or Recover Point Objective (RPO). Firstly, the GUI for 2014 is mostly confusing, i.e., if you need to add any additional technical features, then it doesn't require a change to the GUI. There still a lot of room for improvement in synthetic technologies, especially when targeted to deduplication media. More stable environment in a WAN infrastructure. They can work on the issue of the job timing out when it is unable to reach a selection item. It sometimes hangs up on the selection item, thus preventing the job from continuing. It's not too stable for client-server architecture. Center Management is not so interactive, and then there are some issues regarding the complex licensing which needs improvement. | |
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
Licensing could be better explained. Sometimes, it's unclear what features are available in different licensing models. New licensing is easy and affordable. There is now a subscription based licence option that, depending on your environment, could offer a more efficient method to licence the solution if you are OPEX cost driven rather than CAPEX. If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go. | I would like to see a better licensing model. They changed it and it's just horrendous. It is cheap compared to the other backup technologies. It all depends on the requirements. Depending on the scenario, it can cost less than half of the price of other methods. Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology. If your company can afford it, go for it. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs. 300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||
Answers from the Community | ||||
See all 44 answers » | ||||
Ranking | ||||
Views 36,476 Comparisons 22,373 Reviews 9 Followers 1,296 Avg. Rating 8.9 | Views 21,751 Comparisons 13,936 Reviews 8 Followers 1,381 Avg. Rating 7.4 | Views 0 Comparisons 0 Reviews 1 Followers 1 Avg. Rating 5.0 | ||
Top Comparisons | ||||
 Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. | Compared 37% of the time. Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. | Compared 53% of the time.  Compared 47% of the time. | ||
Also Known As | ||||
| Backup Exec, Symantec Backup Exec | ||||
Website/Video | ||||
| CommVault | Veritas | Null Vendor | ||
Overview  | ||||
Commvault can help you transform your data into a powerful strategic asset, with data protection and information management solutions that enable you to protect, access and use all of your data anywhere and anytime. | Backup Exec delivers powerful, flexible, and easy-to-use backup and recovery to protect your entire infrastructure whether built upon virtual, physical, or a combination of both. Backup Exec is licensed per media server, agent and option. | Information Not Available | ||
OFFER | ||||
Learn more about Commvault | Learn more about Veritas Backup Exec | Learn more about Null Product | ||
Sample Customers | ||||
| Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance | Beta Offshore | Information Not Available | ||
Top Industries | ||||
VISITORS READING REVIEWS 16% 13% 10% 9% | VISITORS READING REVIEWS 13% 13% 8% 8% | No Data Available | ||
Company Size | ||||
REVIEWERS 30% 30% 40% VISITORS READING REVIEWS 19% 29% 52% | REVIEWERS 45% 55% VISITORS READING REVIEWS 30% 30% 40% | No Data Available | ||
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault vs. Veritas Backup Exec and others in Backup and Recovery Software.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Commvault Reviews, Veritas Backup Exec Reviews, and our list of Best Backup and Recovery Software Companies.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 21000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 21000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.
Frankly, we don't use any of above 2 software. We are using Veeam Backup, a rising star, as the mainline now.
Hi, I would recommend Veritas NetBackup if the environment heavily has physical components instead of virtual components. I find NetBackup more user friendly and more technological. NetBackup has also appliances which provides media server role as a whole (including storage network, Red Hat OS etc). Dedupe technology is very good. With 8.1, there are many good features such as cloud catalyst which provides less data to the cloud provider. Moreover, I recommend to look at 360 data management philosophy.
Like man other collègues i would recommand you to go with veeam!
My Commvault and Veritas Netbackup experiences are quite dated. My team and I were going to do a Commvault POC last year but voted against it as Commvault would have required a lot of time and infrastructure resources just to do the test.
We did a Veeam POC which also proved to be more resource intensive than what we were willing to use in our environment.
After working with Rubrik, it was a no-brainer. We invested 2 days from racking the test unit to backing up 450 VMs. Even though Rubrik is a fairly new player, it provides most of the functionality we need at this time and in the future.
Another new player I just had the opportunity to play with is Hycu. This solution was designed from the ground up to fully integrate with the Nutanix Hyperconverged infrastructure we deployed to replace our Cisco UCS / NetApp / VMware Flexpod.
So, in conclusion, one of our goals was to find an environment that would free up our time from daily administrivia and complexity so we could focus more in proactive system administration and projects.
I hope my comments provide some value to the colleague. The best approach to decide what is right for a specific company is to put some effort in POCs and testing the products in their specific infrastructure to make sure it meets their needs and fills their requirements in terms of their immediate and future plans.
Commvault is better for cloud