Compare Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 25th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 1 review while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 12 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 9.0, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes " Effective heuristics make for better ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks writes "Its multi-layer approach helps my organization with anti-malware, exploit protection, and restrictions". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), Sophos Intercept X and Bitdefender GravityZone, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with CrowdStrike, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) and Microsoft Windows Defender.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: April 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well.

Read more »

WildFire AI is the best option for this product.The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service.The stability of the solution is very good. We have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week.It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core.We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface. It has a lot of benefits for us.It blocks malicious files. It prevents attacks. It doesn't require many updates, it's a very light application.The most valuable features are the fact that it was running in the background and it would intercept any weird stuff, and the fact that it would send things directly to the cloud for sandboxing. It's quite practical.After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent.

Read more »

Cons
Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine.

Read more »

The dashboard is the area that needs to improve so that we can have the ability to drill down without having to go elsewhere to verify results.It automatically detects security issues. It should be able to protect our network devices while operating autonomously.The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports.In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved.Currently, if you use Palo Alto endpoint protection as the only solution it's very complicated to remove pre-existing threats.Managing the product should be easier.There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly.There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around. In the hotel industry, we use a different type of data versus Oracle and SQL. By default, there are some policies which stop us from running properly. Because of this, the support level is also not that strong. We have to wait to get a results.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This is an expensive solution.The price was fine.When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward.I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require.It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses.The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase.It is "expensive" and flexible.Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,301
Comparisons
1,031
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
995
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
19,082
Comparisons
13,640
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
747
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Comodo AEPCyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps
Learn
Comodo
Palo Alto Networks
Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the world's first detection and response app that natively integrates network, endpoint and cloud data to stop sophisticated attacks. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks accurately detects threats with behavioral analytics and reveals the root cause to speed up investigations.

Offer
Learn more about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Learn more about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Sample Customers
Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI PropertiesCBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company22%
Mining And Metals Company22%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider15%
Construction Company6%
Retailer5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: April 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.