Compare Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 25th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 1 review while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 15 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 9.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes " Effective heuristics make for better ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security writes "Enables us to reduce costs and offers manufacturing control". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), Sophos Intercept X and Bitdefender GravityZone, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), Bitdefender GravityZone and ESET Endpoint Security.
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: April 2020. 407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well. | The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution. The signature update is done securely. We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end. It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great. The blocking feature is the most valuable feature. The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time. It performs quite well as a firewall protection provider. We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area. |
Cons | |
Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine. | This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting control. There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need. There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions. The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface. It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features. If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution. I would like to see better reporting. It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec. The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates. It is a cost-effective product. I received a very good deal with Kaspersky. It is a cost-effective endpoint security service. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs. 407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,301 Comparisons 1,031 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 995 Avg. Rating 9.0 | Views 13,368 Comparisons 11,477 Reviews 14 Average Words per Review 300 Avg. Rating 7.9 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time. | Compared 21% of the time. Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Comodo AEP | Kaspersky Work Space Security |
Learn | |
| Comodo | Kaspersky Lab |
Overview | |
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data. | Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection | Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security |
Sample Customers | |
| Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties | ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm30% Construction Company20% Energy/Utilities Company10% Security Firm10% Software R&D Company23% Comms Service Provider21% Retailer6% Financial Services Firm6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: April 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Reviews, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Reviews, and our list of Best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business Companies.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.