Compare Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well.""The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pros »

"The blocking feature is the most valuable feature.""It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.""We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end.""The signature update is done securely.""The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution.""Using dashboards, it is very easy to manage.""The security is very good, compared to some other products.""Endpoint Security's most valuable feature is its heuristic analysis. This heuristic approach means that it learns from its past experiences. It is the most valuable feature they have. This contributes to dealing with ransomware, detection, and early mitigation actions."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine.""Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Cons »

"It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features.""The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.""There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions.""There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need.""This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting control.""I would like to see the inclusion of support for device management and device control.""I would like to see enhancements made with respect to the administration.""A big improvement would be allowing us to reconfigure the agents and change what to whitelist for a specific user. If the user is not happy with the configuration and is being blocked from certain sites, we should be able to reconfigure the monitoring mechanics to make it more flexible."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this product should be lower."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec.""For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD).""Kaspersky is priced well.""Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Top Answer: Comodo's default deny technology, their auto containment feature is awesome it puts all unknown files in a virtualized… more »
Top Answer: Comodo's pricing is pretty good and we currently have roughly 200 licenses.
Top Answer: The ability to spit out better reporting.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Comodo AEPKaspersky Work Space Security
Learn
Cisco
Comodo
Kaspersky Lab
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankChristian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI PropertiesACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company23%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider35%
Computer Software Company16%
Government12%
Manufacturing Company8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Construction Company11%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company24%
Media Company4%
Retailer4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise62%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business62%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise21%
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 32nd in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 2 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 19 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 7.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes " Effective heuristics make for better ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security writes "A mature product offering good protection and very good features". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Sophos Intercept X, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, CrowdStrike Falcon and ESET Endpoint Security, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, ESET Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender Antivirus and Check Point Endpoint Security. See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.