Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud are both endpoint protection platforms (EPP) that provide comprehensive security for business endpoints like laptops, desktops and servers. They offer core capabilities like anti-malware, firewall, web filtering, application control and more to prevent, detect and respond to cyber threats.
Users appreciate Comodo's default-deny approach with auto-containment of unknown files, which provides strong protection against zero-day threats. The centralized management console makes it easy to deploy and manage Comodo across all endpoints. Comodo also includes patch management and remote monitoring and management (RMM) features.
Seqrite reviewers highlight the simplicity and ease of use of the cloud-based management portal. They find Seqrite effective at preventing malware infections and give high marks to support. Seqrite provides asset management, vulnerability scan, data loss prevention (DLP) and mobile device management (MDM) functionality.
Both solutions are compatible with Windows, Mac and Linux endpoints. Based on the reviews, Comodo is used more by smaller businesses and Seqrite more by mid-sized companies.
In summary, Comodo has an edge in zero-day threat prevention with its default-deny/auto-containment approach. Seqrite's fully cloud-based architecture and integrated MDM make it attractive for companies with mobile workforces. Proof of concepts are recommended to see which works best in your environment.
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"It's stable and reliable."
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"The solution installs very easily."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."
"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."
"The menu could be cleaned up."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."
"The downside of the product stems from the fact that it is still an unknown product in the market. Comodo needs to invest more in advertisements and promotions."
"The security is too week and needs improvement."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 32nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 14 reviews while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is ranked 57th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 1 review. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is rated 1.0. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes "Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud writes "Security is too weak and patches or reports are not always generated correctly". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is most compared with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Norton Small Business.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.