Compare Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
Sponsored
 | Korede Olatunji Application Manager at Huntington Bancshares Incorporated |
| Anonymous User Senior Technical Product Manager at a tech services company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE."
"The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things."
"The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now."
"I am really satisfied with the technical support."
"It is a very stable program."
"The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features."
"It doesn't impact the devices. It is an agent-based solution, and we see no performance knock on cell phones. That was a big thing for us, especially in the mobile world. We don't see battery degradation like you do with other solutions which really drain the battery, as they're constantly doing things. That can shorten the useful life of a device."
"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."
"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."
"It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will."
"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."
"Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate."
"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."
"There aren't any features that really stand out — I just want it to keep malware out of my system. To date, I haven't had any malware in my system."
Cons
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics."
"In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication."
"The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device."
"In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened."
"The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved."
"I would like more seamless integration."
"The technical support is very slow."
"I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products."
"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."
"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."
"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."
"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."
"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."
"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."
"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."
"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."
"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360."
"The price is very good."
"The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost."
"Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc."
"In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement."
"Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection."
"There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization."
"The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."
"The price of this product should be lower."
"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »
"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."
"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."
"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."
"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."
More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: Among the most valuable features are the exclusions. And on the scalability side, we can integrate well with the SIEM… more »
Top Answer: We use the MSP model, so we're able to pay as we go. We report usage based on the actual usage, which is very handy. The… more »
Top Answer: Like any other security tool, there's always rooms for improvement. Some of the ways the product can be improved are: -… more »
Top Answer: It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful.
Top Answer: The price of this product should be lower.
Top Answer: They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full… more »
Top Answer: The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward.
Top Answer: The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for… more »
Top Answer: We've had some issues with the solution. We were attacked by CryptoLock. It's not the best in security. As we were… more »
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Comodo AEP
Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.
Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection offers a unique security approach that protects against threats across numerous vectors; including email, web browsing, file attachments, hyperlinks, display ads, social media apps, and connected devices like USB drives, as well as other blended threats with the potential to deliver malicious payloads. SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection is fully cloud-based management, means no on-premises hardware or software is needed and the console is always up to date and there are no definitions or signatures to deploy and manage. Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection offers highly accurate and effective endpoint malware prevention with a range of additional security shield capabilities that keep both the user and the device safe, Malware detection occurs continuously in real time, so performance issues fade away.
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Learn more about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
Mytech Partners
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Reseller7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
Comms Service Provider35%
Computer Software Company13%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company6%
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Construction Company4%
University4%
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise55%
No Data Available
Small Business90%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 29th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 5 reviews while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is ranked 21st in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 8 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 7.6, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes " Effective heuristics make for better ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection writes "Keeps mobile devices secure against vulnerabilities or any attacks". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Sophos Intercept X, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, Symantec End-User Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon and CylancePROTECT, whereas Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, SentinelOne, Carbon Black CB Defense and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.