We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN."The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"Provides Anti-DDoS protection, as well as other protections like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting, and antiscanner. These types of protection are valuable to the business due to the daily attacks on our portals, and that often cannot be seen without a tool like this."
"Integration with IBM AS/400 and Db2 is okay."
"It is an effective threat mitigation tool."
"The most valuable features for us are the DDoS and Bot."
"I like the user-friendly interface."
"The setup of Imperva DDoS was easy."
"There is no need to have an appliance in house for the services because it is on the cloud."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
Earn 20 points
Comodo cWatch is ranked 17th in CDN while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri and AWS WAF, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best CDN vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.