• Home
  • Comodo cWatch vs. Oracle Dyn Web Application Security

Comodo cWatch vs Oracle Dyn Web Application Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xcitium Logo

Comodo cWatch

Read 3 Comodo cWatch reviews
338 views|244 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo

Oracle Dyn Web Application Security

Read 1 Oracle Dyn Web Application Security review
106 views|87 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Rajesh-Singh
Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable
Comodo cWatch Web is a Managed Security Service for websites and applications that combines a Web Application Firewall (WAF) provisioned over a... Read more →
Khalil AbdulrahmanAlasbahi
Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable
Oracle security is excellent for our banking organizations in terms of the security offered.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue.""The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."

More Comodo cWatch Pros →

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

More Oracle Dyn Web Application Security Pros →

Cons
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed.""The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."

More Comodo cWatch Cons →

"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."

More Oracle Dyn Web Application Security Cons →

Ranking
35th
out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
338
Comparisons
244
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
49th
out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
106
Comparisons
87
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
cWatch
Dyn Web Application Security, Zenedge
Learn More
Xcitium
Oracle
Overview

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

ZENEDGE offers total security for your Web applications and networks, identifying threat actors, and stopping malicious bot traffic and DDoS attacks from reaching your servers. Malicious traffic is intercepted at the edge of the network by the ZENEDGE cybersecurity platform, stopping it from ever reaching your web application or network, ensuring continued uptime and normal operations. Ongoing monitoring, threat intel and regular security updates protect against new zero-day vulnerabilities.

Sample Customers
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
FoodStorm, Soccer Shots
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Wholesaler/Distributor12%
Manufacturing Company10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise38%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comodo cWatch is ranked 35th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 49th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri and AWS WAF, whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.