Comodo cWatch vs Sucuri comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xcitium Logo
346 views|247 comparisons
Sucuri Security Logo
1,023 views|719 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue.""The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."

More Comodo cWatch Pros →

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing.""The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization.""The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use.""It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website.""The initial setup was very easy.""I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

More Sucuri Pros →

Cons
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed.""The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."

More Comodo cWatch Cons →

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives.""Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section.""The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection.""I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything.""It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance.""In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

More Sucuri Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I’d simply say it’s really worth it."
  • "Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."
  • "The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."
  • "It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."
  • More Sucuri Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The initial setup was very easy.
    Top Answer:The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.
    Top Answer:The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    346
    Comparisons
    247
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,023
    Comparisons
    719
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Cloudflare logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    SiteLock logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Imperva DDoS logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    StackPath WAF logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    cWatch
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

    Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.
    Sample Customers
    Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
    The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Wholesaler/Distributor12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Media Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise28%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Comodo cWatch is ranked 34th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Sucuri is ranked 20th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 6 reviews. Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while Sucuri is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules and AWS WAF, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, SiteLock, Imperva DDoS and StackPath WAF.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.