We performed a comparison between Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] and Huawei NGFW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."The Fortinet FortiGate local partners were good. I did not have direct contact with Fortinet support."
"The most valuable feature is the FortiManager for centralized management."
"It is simple to manage, and there are a lot of functionalities in the same box."
"I like Fortinet FortiGate's antispam filter, SPN, and clustering features."
"The most valuable features are the enterprise modeling and the simple interface."
"Fortigate's most valuable feature is that it doesn't need a push policy when writing rules."
"The notable features that I have found most valuable are that it includes the antivirus, and also IPS, and even SD-WAN."
"There are great templates, so you don't have to customize them if you don't want to. You do have the option to custom create some folders and some reports, however, with what is there, you don't really need to go through extra effort, as they already give you a lot of predefined views of reports and so forth."
"This solution is user-friendly."
"The solution's implementation is pretty easy."
"The solution's performance is good with IPSec."
"I had no difficulty using the Huawei NGFW."
"I like that the initial setup is straighforward. It's also a scalable solution."
"The support for the solution has been excellent. If we ever had an issue they would send an engineer to help us with our problem."
"Huawei was able to assist us in the installation of their product. The installation was very fast."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The security is good. It's as effective as anything else on the market."
"They should make the rule sets more understandable for the end user. When you're trying to explain to somebody how a computer network is secured, sometimes it's difficult for an end user or customer to understand. If there was a way to make the terminology more accessible to the end user, the set up could be easier. They should translate the technical jargon to an easily relatable and understandable conversation for the end user, the customer, that would be brilliant. Particularly in an environment where the IT structure is audited regularly, there's always pressure from the auditor to up the standards and up the security and you get your USCERT's that come out and there's a warning about this and the customer will want to lock out so much and when you apply it they run into issue where they can't search the internet or print to their remote office. Of course they can't print to your remote office, they just locked it up. They should make the language more understandable for the customer. If there's a product out there that made the jargon understandable to John Q. Public, I would buy that."
"This product could be improved with Active directory integration and better handling in IPsec and GRE Tunnels."
"The support team for Fortinet FortiGate needs to be more customer friendly."
"I would like to see improvements in the support from Fortinet. Here in the Philippines, whenever we have problems with a Fortinet product, we mostly ask for support from distributors and resellers and not directly from Fortinet."
"The support we receive when we need to upgrade is not satisfactory and has room for improvement."
"One area for improvement is the performance on the bandwidth demands for smaller devices, as well as better web filtering."
"If they had better integration with security products, such as Cisco ISE or Rapid Threat Containment, then it would be an improvement."
"The user interface could be improved to make it less confusing and easier to set up."
"I haven't seen any feature that will allow me direct authentication for a VPN solution."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"Wi-Fi scanning and Wi-Fi analysis would be useful features to include in the future."
"The solution could be more secure and have better integration."
"The solution requires a more interactive dashboard. That would make it easier than playing with configurations the way we have to now."
"The solution is scalable but it is difficult because you need to purchase new systems, it is not just one click."
"Huawei NGFW should have better reporting and a dashboard for the visibility of traffic."
"The solution does not have sandboxing features."
"The tool does not have web functionality. It needs to also have high end firewalls."
Earn 20 points
Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Firewalls while Huawei NGFW is ranked 30th in Firewalls with 18 reviews. Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Huawei NGFW is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] writes "User-Friendly, improves security, and gives me more control over my VoIP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei NGFW writes "A scalable and easy-to-setup product that can be used to configure different policies for specific users". Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Huawei NGFW is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Meraki MX, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Sophos XG.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.