We performed a comparison between Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] and McAfee StoneGate [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."Web filtering and two-factor authentication are great features."
"With FortiClient, you can easily connect when you are home, check out what you want to do, and connect to your network when you are not at work. You can switch on servers and you can check what is wrong."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's very easy to set up, it's very easy to make policies and, for an organization, that means you don't need IT expert in firewalls. You just need to have somebody who knows a little bit of IT, and that's it. With other products, you need someone with a "Masters" degree in firewalls."
"The pipe filter application is an outstanding feature."
"The most valuable features are SD-WAN, application control, IPS control, and FortiSandbox."
"Its user interface is good, and it is always working fine."
"The solution is very user friendly. The user interface in particular is quite nice."
"This solution is user-friendly."
"We did not have issues with scalabiliy."
"It works well with a highly-active cluster."
"A couple of things I've seen that need improvement, especially in terms of a hard coding. The driver-level active moment really is out-of-the-box and we have to have contact the customer support and sometimes it is difficult to resolve."
"There are some license issues. Not every feature must have a separate license. There must be some of kind synergy between the license so we don't have to pay for every individual license that we would like to have."
"I would like to see improvements in the support from Fortinet. Here in the Philippines, whenever we have problems with a Fortinet product, we mostly ask for support from distributors and resellers and not directly from Fortinet."
"Fortinet FortiGate is not very easy to use. The navigation could be improved to make it easier to use."
"Fortinet needs to overhaul its documentation."
"The monitor and the visibility, in this proxy, is very weak."
"It would be good if they had fewer updates."
"There are problems with the custom reporting of the unique traffic. The data is there, but it is too difficult for us to extract."
"I haven't seen any feature that will allow me direct authentication for a VPN solution."
"After some experience with the solution, we had to do some redesign, but generally, we were happy with the product."
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Firewalls while McAfee StoneGate [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Firewalls. Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is rated 8.0, while McAfee StoneGate [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] writes "User-Friendly, improves security, and gives me more control over my VoIP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee StoneGate [EOL] writes "The HA cluster had issues during deployment, but the solution gives us better application control than with our previous solution". Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is most compared with , whereas McAfee StoneGate [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
