Compare Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway vs. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Bitglass and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: September 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition.""The licensing is not expensive.""The price of this product should be reduced to make it more competitive.""Licensing is flexible. License pricing information is based on the customer, their environment, and on the future approach."

More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Security Gateways solutions are best for your needs.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The antiviral sandboxing.
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is okay. We pay licensing fees but the cost depends on the package that we take. There are… more »
Top Answer: The issues we have are more around organizational issues between us and Forcepoint. We don't have problems with the… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
OpenDNSDome Secure Web GatewayForcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
Learn
Cisco
Comodo
Forcepoint
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Today's hackers are incredibly sophisticated, and they have a lot of tools and techniques at their disposal. It's not enough to understand past attacks and prevent others just like them - you also need to protect against attacks you don't know about. How do you fight the unknown? Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway delivers a suite of security capabilities to identify and stop any kind of malicious activity from getting in. And it does so without affecting the experience of your legitimate users. After all, they still need to do their jobs.

Websense Web Security blocks web threats to reduce malware infections, decrease help desk incidents and free up valuable IT resources. It has more than 100 security and filtering categories, hundreds of web application and protocol controls, and 60-plus reports with customization and role-based access.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway
Learn more about Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Information Not Available
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm23%
Consumer Goods Company9%
Healthcare Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company28%
Government5%
Manufacturing Company3%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Healthcare Company15%
Integrator8%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise40%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise59%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Bitglass and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: September 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway is ranked 18th in Web Security Gateways while Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 4th in Web Security Gateways with 9 reviews. Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway is rated 0.0, while Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Flexible endpoint security, provides URL filtering, and the reporting is good". Comodo Dome Secure Web Gateway is most compared with , whereas Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Email Security, McAfee Web Protection, Symantec Secure Web Gateway and Barracuda Web Security Gateway.

See our list of best Web Security Gateways vendors.

We monitor all Web Security Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.