We performed a comparison between Comodo RMM and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The management feature is very good. You get a complete and clear view of the employment tool on Linux, Mac, and Windows operating systems (even on mobile). Third-party integration is also possible (e.g., IBM, Apple, etc.)."
"The most valuable features of Comodo RMM are the security antivirus and the ability to use other applications like the PSA and the ticketing system on one dashboard."
"We like the auto containment feature."
"The product is very stable."
"We are able to connect to clients who are currently not connected to the VPN, and we are also able to do direct file transfers between the technician and the client."
"It enhances collaboration among my board members during board meetings, whether annual, regular, or irregular."
"We use the product to communicate."
"It's considered a trusted application."
"The remote access is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is Remote Access."
"The product helps us efficiently fix technical issues and maintain system downtime."
"Comodo RMM is really, really slow to load, and connecting with most of my clients takes a while."
"They should integrate email security in the same solution."
"The solution needs further integration with other software tools like a CRM and other accounting tools. Not having this integration makes Comodo RMM limited in functionality. Additionally, more network management features would be good to have in the next release."
"The connectivity could improve."
"Sometimes you need more services and need to buy more, depending on if you need it short term or long term."
"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."
"It could be more secure."
"One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature."
"There could be stable connectivity for the product’s current technology."
"The security of the solution could be more secure."
"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."
Comodo RMM is ranked 13th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 3 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. Comodo RMM is rated 8.4, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comodo RMM writes "Great remote controlling and monitoring features with a competitive price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". Comodo RMM is most compared with NinjaOne, Atera and Kaseya VSA, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with Azure Bastion, NinjaOne, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and Kaseya VSA. See our Comodo RMM vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
