BMC Compuware COPE vs BMC Compuware Xpediter comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo
38 views|15 comparisons
BMC Logo
154 views|105 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Compuware COPE and BMC Compuware Xpediter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development.
To learn more, read our detailed Mainframe Application Development Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
38
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
154
Comparisons
105
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Application Development
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
COPE
Learn More
Overview

As The Mainframe Software Company for the Next 50 Years, Compuware Corporation empowers the world’s largest companies to advance their mainframe intellectual property to meet the demands of the digital economy. Our application development, testing and performance management software set the industry standard by enabling businesses to deliver high-quality applications more quickly, reliably and resource-efficiently.

Xpediter is Compuware’s mainframe application interactive debugging tool. It also offers code coverage for mainframe application analysis.

Xpediter enables developers to get into an interactive test session with minimal effort and quickly move applications into production with greater confidence.

With Xpediter, developers can:

  • See and control source code execution line by line
  • Fully understand what each individual instruction is doing
  • See and control all data variables within a test session
  • Resolve production abends without impacting program logic or risking data corruption
  • Monitor and control execution with added flexibility
  • Use Code Coverage to view documented proof that code has been executed
  • Trap transactions initiated by a remote source or a non-terminal task
  • Gain full control of testing
  • Create conditions during test to ensure execution of all code in a program
  • Work alongside other developers who are debugging application code in the same or different logical IMS systems through Xpediter’s integration with COPE IMS virtualization technology

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Credit Union, IMT, Chunghwa Telecom, Pitney Bowes, Helvetia
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Computer Software Company11%
Insurance Company11%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Application Development
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Compuware COPE is ranked 12th in Mainframe Application Development while BMC Compuware Xpediter is ranked 6th in Mainframe Application Development. BMC Compuware COPE is rated 0.0, while BMC Compuware Xpediter is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC Compuware Xpediter writes "From a development perspective, it allowed me to validate every line of my logic if necessary, most times in one pass". BMC Compuware COPE is most compared with , whereas BMC Compuware Xpediter is most compared with IBM Debug Tool, InterTest, BMC Compuware Topaz Workbench and IBM Fault Analyzer for zOS.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.