Concourse for VMware Tanzu vs Harness comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Concourse for VMware Tanzu and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent."
  • More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We never experienced any problems with scalability.
    Top Answer:The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent.
    Top Answer:The biggest gap for me was just that the solution is relatively tied to Cloud Foundry. If you have anything you need to deploy outside of that, it becomes burdensome. I would like to see additional… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    15th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    660
    Comparisons
    622
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    246
    Rating
    7.0
    11th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    2,322
    Comparisons
    1,872
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pivotal Concourse, Concourse for PCF, Concourse
    Learn More
    Harness
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Continuous integration for application developers:

    Concourse for VMware Tanzu is a CI/CD system remastered for teams that practice agile development and deliver frequently to one or many cloud platforms.

    Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

    Sample Customers
    Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq
    Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Healthcare Company4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Concourse for VMware Tanzu is ranked 15th in Build Automation with 1 review while Harness is ranked 11th in Build Automation. Concourse for VMware Tanzu is rated 7.0, while Harness is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Concourse for VMware Tanzu writes "This solution is scalable and stable, but needs more support for deployments outside of Cloud Foundry". On the other hand, Concourse for VMware Tanzu is most compared with Jenkins, Tekton, TeamCity and GitLab, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo and TeamCity.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.