Concourse for VMware Tanzu vs Jenkins comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
VMware Logo
628 views|593 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Concourse for VMware Tanzu and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We never experienced any problems with scalability."

More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Pros →

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are the integration with GitHub, and the automation for deployment.""Jenkins has excellent task planning features.""We have started to integrate Pipelines as a part of a build, and built a library of common functions. It simplified and made our build scripts more readable.""The most valuable features of Jenkins are the ease of use and the information about how to use the features is readily available on the internet. Additionally, with the solution, I can use other reporting tools, such as Flow.""For business needs, Jenkins is the most relevant choice because it can be self-hosted, the price is good, it’s robust, and requires almost no effort for maintenance.""The auto-schedule feature is valuable. Another valuable feature is that Jenkins does not trigger a build when there is no change in any of the systems. Jenkins also supports most of the open-source plug-ins.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration between different tools.""The most valuable aspect of Jenkins is pipeline customization. Jenkins provides a declarative pipeline as well as a scripted pipeline. The scripted pipeline uses a programming language. You can customize it to your needs, so we use Jenkins because other solutions like Travis and Spinnaker don't allow much customization."

More Jenkins Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see additional support for things outside of Cloud Foundry."

More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Cons →

"The bug fix speed is very slow.""Jenkins relies on the old version of interface for configuration management. This needs improvement.""Jenkins could improve by adding the ability to edit test automation and make time planning better because it is difficult. It should be easier to do.""The documentation on plugin development could be better: more examples. ​""Some kind of SaaS product would be helpful in providing organizational structure.""Support should be provided at no cost, as there is no free support available for any of the free versions.""Sometimes you have Jenkins restarting because of OOM errors.""We need more licensed product integrations."

More Jenkins Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent."
  • More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We never experienced any problems with scalability.
    Top Answer:The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent.
    Top Answer:The biggest gap for me was just that the solution is relatively tied to Cloud Foundry. If you have anything you need to deploy outside of that, it becomes burdensome. I would like to see additional… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very easy… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    628
    Comparisons
    593
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    246
    Rating
    7.0
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pivotal Concourse, Concourse for PCF, Concourse
    Learn More
    Overview

    Continuous integration for application developers:

    Concourse for VMware Tanzu is a CI/CD system remastered for teams that practice agile development and deliver frequently to one or many cloud platforms.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Concourse for VMware Tanzu is ranked 15th in Build Automation with 1 review while Jenkins is ranked 2nd in Build Automation with 83 reviews. Concourse for VMware Tanzu is rated 7.0, while Jenkins is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Concourse for VMware Tanzu writes "This solution is scalable and stable, but needs more support for deployments outside of Cloud Foundry". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jenkins writes "A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment". Concourse for VMware Tanzu is most compared with Tekton, GitLab, TeamCity, Bamboo and Harness, whereas Jenkins is most compared with GitLab, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, IBM Rational Build Forge and Tekton.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.