Condeco vs Manhattan IWMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Condeco Logo
106 views|82 comparisons
Manhattan Software Logo
205 views|126 comparisons
Ranking
Views
106
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
205
Comparisons
126
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Manhattan Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Combining advanced workspace insight with exceptional design, our products ensure seamless client experiences and help you make the right impression at all times.

Whether you need a single site solution or global deployment, we have the experience to partner with you and deliver beyond expectations.

From design to installation to training, our dedicated teams ensure you’ll receive the best knowledge 
and service on the market.

Manhattan IWMS is an enterprise solution, it manages the complete real estate and facilities life cycle from lease administration & accounting, financial management and budgeting, to project management and real estate & portfolio management to capital asset planning, space planning & scheduling, operations and maintenance, and energy management. Manhattan IWMS functionality is designed for the entire facility lifecycle to maximise resource utilization while reducing the total cost of occupancy (TCO).
Sample Customers
GE, Barclays, Reuters, Unilever, Universal, Ricoh, BNP Paribas
Baptist Health South Florida (BHSF)

Condeco is ranked 9th in Workplace Management Software while Manhattan IWMS is ranked 7th in Workplace Management Software. Condeco is rated 0.0, while Manhattan IWMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Condeco is most compared with , whereas Manhattan IWMS is most compared with IBM Tririga Workplace Management and Archibus ARCHIBUS.

See our list of best Workplace Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Workplace Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.