Condeco vs Siterra+ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Condeco Logo
106 views|82 comparisons
Siterra Logo
67 views|52 comparisons
Ranking
Views
106
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
67
Comparisons
52
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Siterra
Video Not Available
Overview

Combining advanced workspace insight with exceptional design, our products ensure seamless client experiences and help you make the right impression at all times.

Whether you need a single site solution or global deployment, we have the experience to partner with you and deliver beyond expectations.

From design to installation to training, our dedicated teams ensure you’ll receive the best knowledge 
and service on the market.

The Siterra real estate & site management software system was created in 2001 to help real estate and telecommunications industry professionals gain total control of their sites, leases, projects and data. With features purpose-built for the telecom industry, Siterra includes a suite of commercial real estate property management software focused on improving operational efficiencies for the site management lifecycle. Siterra helps more than 50,000 users manage over 1,000,000 sites and 1.7 million projects globally. Siterra is a SaaS-based offering.

Sample Customers
GE, Barclays, Reuters, Unilever, Universal, Ricoh, BNP Paribas
prohealth care, Loreal, BASF, James Madison University, Helzeberg Diamonds

Condeco is ranked 9th in Workplace Management Software while Siterra+ is ranked 11th in Workplace Management Software. Condeco is rated 0.0, while Siterra+ is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Condeco is most compared with , whereas Siterra+ is most compared with .

See our list of best Workplace Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Workplace Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.