We performed a comparison between Confluent and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The monitoring module is impressive."
"The documentation process is fast with the tool."
"Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site."
"It is also good for knowledge base management."
"The most valuable is its capability to enhance the documentation process, particularly when creating software documentation."
"I find Confluent's Kafka Connectors and Kafka Streams invaluable for my use cases because they simplify real-time data processing and ETL tasks by providing reliable, pre-packaged connectors and tools."
"The solution can handle a high volume of data because it works and scales well."
"Kafka Connect framework is valuable for connecting to the various source systems where code doesn't need to be written."
"I am impressed with the tool's possibility of integrating different systems in a unified place."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"Oracle GoldenGate helps to select and target specific tables for replication. Any changes or operations on those tables are immediately reflected in the source and target environments."
"What I have found the most valuable about GoldenGate is that it does real-time and no-downtime migrations. Its migrations are fast. There are not many tools like it on the marketplace."
"For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"Many of the features of Oracle GoldenGate are valuable. We use Oracle databases and this tool is from Oracle, making it have superior compatibility."
"I like that the product transforms data and provides real-time applications."
"It is quite scalable."
"The formatting aspect within the page can be improved and more powerful."
"It could have more integration with different platforms."
"There is a limitation when it comes to seamlessly importing Microsoft documents into Confluent pages, which can be inconvenient for users who frequently work with Microsoft Office tools and need to transition their content to Confluent."
"The product should integrate tools for incorporating diagrams like Lucidchart. It also needs to improve its formatting features. We also faced issues while granting permissions."
"there is room for improvement in the visualization."
"Confluent's price needs improvement."
"It would help if the knowledge based documents in the support portal could be available for public use as well."
"They should remove Zookeeper because of security issues."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The front-end management isn't very good."
"It would be better for Oracle Golden Gate Studio GUI to include other licensed products (i.e. Veridata or others)."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"Microservices Architecture is not user-friendly."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"The solution costs a lot."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
Confluent is ranked 3rd in Streaming Analytics with 18 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Confluent is rated 8.4, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Confluent writes "Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Confluent is most compared with Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis, AWS Glue, Databricks and Aiven for Apache Kafka, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Fivetran. See our Confluent vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.