Conformiq vs Eggplant Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Conformiq Logo
428 views|180 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Keysight Technologies Logo
436 views|241 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Conformiq and Eggplant Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart.""The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools."

More Conformiq Pros →

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant.""Good text reading ability.""The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing.""DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options.""Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition.""It provides very strong cross-platform support.""GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial.""Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

More Eggplant Test Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow.""Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have.""It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system."

More Conformiq Cons →

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing.""The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans.""A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment.""The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement.""They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application.""The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant.""The solution would crash from time to time.""If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

More Eggplant Test Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."
  • "Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."
  • "End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."
  • "It probably has a yearly license."
  • "This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."
  • "Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."
  • More Eggplant Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Conformiq is a Model-Based Testing (MBT) platform which they say helps organizations automate their Functional Testing. MBT is a software testing approach that uses models to represent the system… more »
    Top Answer:Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology.
    Top Answer:Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price.
    Ranking
    19th
    Views
    428
    Comparisons
    180
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    8th
    Views
    436
    Comparisons
    241
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    539
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Conformiq Creator, Conformiq Transformer
    Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights
    Learn More
    Overview

    Conformiq Creator provides a solution for automating testing processes and speeding up the software development lifecycle of Enterprise IT applications. Conformiq Creator is used in various sectors, including Telecom, Banking, Finance, Insurance, Retail, and Public Sector services. Launched initially in 2013, Creator quickly gained popularity among its users for its functional testing, application testing, system testing, and end-to-end testing.

    Conformiq Transformer shortens the path to test automation, simplifies model-based testing (MBT) adoption using existing methods, and automates manual test execution. Along with Conformiq Creator, which generates executable test cases, scripts and documentation from models, it automates and transforms test design, extending the Conformiq 360° Test Automation™ solution for complex system testing at the speed of development.

    Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

    With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

    Sample Customers
    Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Daimler, Ericsson
    FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Logistics Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Conformiq is ranked 19th in Test Management Tools while Eggplant Test is ranked 8th in Test Management Tools with 16 reviews. Conformiq is rated 8.0, while Eggplant Test is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Conformiq writes "Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Eggplant Test writes "Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability". Conformiq is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Cognizant ADPART, whereas Eggplant Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and froglogic Squish.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.