Contrast Security Protect vs Polyspace Code Prover comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Contrast Security Logo
954 views|728 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
MathWorks Logo
1,773 views|1,161 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Contrast Security Protect and Polyspace Code Prover based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Contrast Security Protect vs. Polyspace Code Prover Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ToddMcAlister
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Protect provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks.""The solution has excellent real-time capabilities.""The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives."

More Contrast Security Protect Pros →

"The product detects memory corruptions.""When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences.""Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool.""The outputs are very reliable.""Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

More Polyspace Code Prover Pros →

Cons
"There's room for improvement in the initial setup.""Protect's reporting GUI is very basic. To get all statuses from the APIs, we needed to write our own KPI dashboard to provide reports.""Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration."

More Contrast Security Protect Cons →

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format.""One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run.""Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes.""Automation could be a challenge.""The tool has some stability issues."

More Polyspace Code Prover Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives.
Top Answer:Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration.
Top Answer:When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts… more »
Top Answer:There are two main areas of improvement. * False negatives and false positives. * The speed of the validation itself. Another area I see for improvement is scalability, particularly when dealing with… more »
Ranking
Views
954
Comparisons
728
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
293
Rating
8.0
Views
1,773
Comparisons
1,161
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
656
Rating
7.6
Comparisons
Also Known As
Contrast Protect
Learn More
MathWorks
Video Not Available
Overview

Contrast Security is the world’s leading provider of security technology that enables software applications to protect themselves against cyberattacks, heralding the new era of self-protecting software. Contrast's patented deep security instrumentation is the breakthrough technology that enables highly accurate assessment and always-on protection of an entire application portfolio, without disruptive scanning or expensive security experts. Only Contrast has sensors that work actively inside applications to uncover vulnerabilities, prevent data breaches, and secure the entire enterprise from development, to operations, to production.

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

Sample Customers
Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.
Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company16%
Manufacturing Company9%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company34%
Computer Software Company15%
Transportation Company7%
Retailer5%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise77%
Buyer's Guide
Contrast Security Protect vs. Polyspace Code Prover
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Protect vs. Polyspace Code Prover and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Contrast Security Protect is ranked 32nd in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews while Polyspace Code Prover is ranked 23rd in Application Security Tools with 5 reviews. Contrast Security Protect is rated 8.4, while Polyspace Code Prover is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Contrast Security Protect writes "It provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polyspace Code Prover writes "A stable solution for developing software components". Contrast Security Protect is most compared with SonarQube, Fortify on Demand, Snyk, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Sonatype Lifecycle, whereas Polyspace Code Prover is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork, CodeSonar and Parasoft SOAtest. See our Contrast Security Protect vs. Polyspace Code Prover report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.