We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Control-M vs. Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Camunda, Pega and others in Process Automation. Updated: November 2021.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere.""Its cost is a little bit higher than other solutions such as AutoSys or DAC. For the demo, there were some plans, such as start plan, scale plan, etc. Pricing was based on the plan.""This is an expensive product compared to other solutions, although I think that it is a good one. We are in a good position with licensing, as we can run 10,000 jobs.""There are two different types of licenses available. The first is based on the number of jobs that we run per day, and the other is based on the number of agents that we install. My current project has a contract for five years.""In our environment, pricing depends on the total number of maximum jobs that can run, which is fine. Therefore, if the number of jobs increases, then the licensing fees will increase.""Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs.""Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for.""You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."

More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
Top Answer: Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in the following points: 1- One of the oldest job scheduling solutions on the… more »
Top Answer: Control-M has helped to improve our data transfers because it allows us to monitor the execution of the process. With other technologies, we cannot do that.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 39 in Process Automation
Views
29,741
Comparisons
13,213
Reviews
34
Average Words per Review
1,371
Rating
8.9
29th
out of 72 in Cloud Management
Views
919
Comparisons
799
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Control M
Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
Learn More
Overview

Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

  • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
  • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
  • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
  • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
  • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation (CSA) provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Control-M
Learn more about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation
Sample Customers
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Computer Software Company12%
Retailer8%
Transportation Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm7%
Healthcare Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise82%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Camunda, Pega and others in Process Automation. Updated: November 2021.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Control-M is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 36 reviews while Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is ranked 29th in Cloud Management. Control-M is rated 8.8, while Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Control-M writes "Allows us to integrate file transfers more readily, resolve issues quickly, and orchestrate a diverse landscape of vendor products". On the other hand, Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation, ActiveBatch Workload Automation and ASG-Zena, whereas Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), AWS Control Tower, Operations Orchestration and vCloud Director.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.