• Home
  • Control-M vs. XM SendSecure [EOL]

Control-M vs XM SendSecure [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo

Control-M

Read 110 Control-M reviews
2,154 views|819 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

XM SendSecure [EOL]

views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Control-M and XM SendSecure [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I found it easy to work with although I had no prior experience
Control-M ensures that our files are secure and the data pipeline is accessible. It helps. It also allows us to create and monitor data while... Read more →
Use XM SendSecure [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."
  • "BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."
  • "we are more looking for a better cost/license/performance model because BMC, while we could say it's the best, is also the most expensive. That is what we are probably most annoyed with. We are paying something like €1,000,000 over three years for having 4,000 jobs running. That's expensive."
  • "We have account based licensing. There are two or three types of licensing. One of them is based on the number of jobs, so we a license close to 4,000 jobs per day. The cost is based on the different modules, which we buy from them. If we a buy a hardware module, which we are presently using and integrating, that is an additional cost, but I'm not sure of the amount. Each module comes with a different cost."
  • "As we increase the number of tasks or jobs on the system, there are concerns about cost."
  • "We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing."
  • "This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."
  • "It works on task-based licensing."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:In Helix Control-M, we have the automation API that allows us to customize and do integrations easily in any script, such as Java or Python. It is all integrated within the integration API.
    Read all 70 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
    Top Answer:It is not bad. The company can afford it, and it pays for itself. We have those jobs running automatically.
    Read all 45 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    2,154
    Comparisons
    819
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    1,502
    Rating
    9.1
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Learn More
    BMC
    OpenText
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

    Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution.

    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    OCHIN, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Neptune Energy, Department for International Development, British American Tobacco, ZOLL Medical, Matson Logistics
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Control-M is ranked 2nd in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 110 reviews while XM SendSecure [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Control-M is rated 8.8, while XM SendSecure [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Control-M writes "We have seen quicker file transfers with more visibility and stability". On the other hand, Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Rocket Zena, ESP Workload Automation Intelligence and Automic Workload Automation, whereas XM SendSecure [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.