ControlCase vs Modulo Risk Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ControlCase Logo
45 views|16 comparisons
Modulo Logo
107 views|87 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ControlCase and Modulo Risk Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Governance Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
out of 15 in IT Governance
Views
45
Comparisons
16
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 15 in IT Governance
Views
107
Comparisons
87
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
IT Governance
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Modulo
Video Not Available
Overview
ControlCase is a product suite that can help organization address a wide range of regulatory requirements. It can help organizations comply with multiple regulations using a single audit. ControlCase assists company auditors to collect evidence for all these regulations one time with an objective to distribute them to multiple auditors looking at single point regulations such as SOX or FISMA. ControlCase is currently being used at leading fortune companies and government agencies currently.

Modulo Risk Manager™ software helps organizations streamline and automate processes required for in-depth risk assessment and compliance projects by collecting and centralizing data relating to technology assets, such as software and equipment, as well as non-technology assets such as people, processes and physical facilities within an organization to assess risk and ensure compliance. The software also allows the quick and comprehensive generation of reports resulting from the data collected. Modulo Risk Manager features knowledge bases that assist organizations in assessing and achieving compliance with SOX, PCI, ISO 27001, HIPAA, COBIT, ITIL, FISAP, FISMA, NIST 800-53a, FIPS 199, A 130 and DOD 8500.2 and can be customized to assess for compliance with additional standards.

Modulo Risk Manager automates the IT risk assessment process and produces multiple compliance reports from the same data, reducing “audit silos”. It can be learned quickly, will run on a laptop or server and is agent-free.

Modulo Risk Manager makes the calculation of risk scores easy because it contains knowledge of IT assets, best practices for the various standards and contains workable default risk component values for every asset and control, estimated by the Modulo Security Lab. This same knowledge base simplifies the process of human interviews with prepared questionnaires. Time is saved by encapsulating these interviews with a viewer that can be emailed to the persons to be surveyed, or answer via the Web. After completion, the answers are mapped to the best practice controls for any standard and saved automatically into the secure audit repository.

Sample Customers
Zaakpay, Union National Bank, HPS, Soci_t_ G_n_rale, Siemens, Skava, Amtrak, Click & Pledge, Wema Bank, Ibibo
Lafarge, Xerox Brasil, IBM, PennState, Univision, Fifa World Cup Brasil, Synovus, Eletrobras, Grey group, Microsoft, Apex Brasil
Buyer's Guide
IT Governance
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ControlCase is ranked 14th in IT Governance while Modulo Risk Manager is ranked 9th in IT Governance. ControlCase is rated 0.0, while Modulo Risk Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ControlCase is most compared with , whereas Modulo Risk Manager is most compared with Nasdaq BWise.

See our list of best IT Governance vendors.

We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.